Jump to content


Photo

Potential Customer Needs User Reviews


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 noblenull

noblenull

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 04 January 2005 - 01:34 PM

The company I work for is thinking about purchasing MOM. I would like to get a few user opinions before we make our decision. Please let me know what you think.

1. Do you feel that MOM is a good value?

2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support? How about their SiteLink support?

3. What other software packages did you consider before going with MOM?

4. Are you using SiteLink or an Alternative E-commerce suite? Do you host it yourself?

5. Do you integrate MOM with UPS WorldShip? Successfully?

Thank you in advance for all who answer.

#2 interwoven

interwoven

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 05 January 2005 - 06:58 AM

The company I work for is thinking about purchasing MOM.  I would like to get a few user opinions before we make our decision.  Please let me know what you think.

1. Do you feel that MOM is a good value?

2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support?  How about their SiteLink support?

3. What other software packages did you consider before going with MOM?

4. Are you using SiteLink or an Alternative E-commerce suite?  Do you host it yourself?

5. Do you integrate MOM with UPS WorldShip?  Successfully?

Thank you in advance for all who answer.

View Post


We have been using MOM for almost a year now. My thoughts on MOM after this time:
1. MOM is inexpensive Mail Order software compared to alot of companies out there. I feel for the price it is a good value. Is there better software out there? I feel there is but wasn't ready to spend $25,000 at our present level. For the price I think you get a very good value.

2. Support. Overall I am happy with the attitutde of the support staff. I have never been treated rudely or badly and I was on the phone daily in the beginning. I do have two issues with support. I logged my hold times for a couple of months and I feel they are a little long. If they supplied a toll free number I feel I could not complain about the hold times. You can email them and they will call you back which is what I do on non-urgent issues but if you have a customer at the counter and need help that is no good.
Also they advertise Friday hours as 9:00-4:45 which is not true. They have a meeting on Friday mornings and I have gotten the "support is in a meeting message as late as noon". I feel they should have their meetings earlier or advertise support hours on Friday to reflect the times you actually can get ahold of them.

3. I loked at Mailware & Cam Commerce Retail Star. I needed a POS module so that eliminated Mailware and Retail Star was much more money and more of a straight POS system then Mail Order Software.

4. I do not use Sitelink and will refrain from commenting on this as I only know what I have read. Our site is hosted on a third party server and we use a third party cart software.

5. Did not integrate MOM with World Ship and use the MOM shipping module. It eliminated worldship for us and I feel is the best way to go. All shipping is handled thru MOM and it really works well. Also if you do credit cards the gateway with Authorize Net works very well. Being able to approve cards while the customer is on the phone with you is great. Very happy with that also. You do need DSL or Cable internet connection. We just use them as a gateway to our actual card processor as we have brick & mortar stores also. The setup fee is high though.

At any rate good luck with your search. Overall MOM has worked well for us and although there are many things I would like to see in the software I know they can only do so much.

Take Care,
Brian

#3 malexios

malexios

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 05 January 2005 - 07:02 AM

I am still setting MOM up and have used it for less than four months, but:


2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support? How about their SiteLink support?

Datacom support... They are friendly, but useless.

Some questions I have had for them:
Q. Unable to run the client as a user other than Administrator.
Dydacomp's answer: Don't know. Your server must be set up wrong.
Actual answer: Modify permissions on c:\winnt\system32\foxuser.*

Q. When I access MOM in terminal services typed text doesn't appear
Dydacomp's answer: Don't know. Check Technet.
Actual answer: I'm SOL, guess I'll use TightVNC

Q. Can I use MOM over a VPN?
Dydacomp's answer: Yes
Actual anwer: No. You have to use terminal emulation

Can I customize a report? Change a value? How do I do XXXX?
Dydacomp's Answer: Call MOMHelpers for custom programming.

There is never any mention of opening a ticket or researching a problem. If you push the issue they will ask whoever else happens to be there.

Our needs are a bit different than many mail order companies, and if we stick with MOM we are going to end up giving MOMhelpers several times the cost of the software to get it working the way we need it to.

Has anyone used Mailware? http://www.core-tech.com/

#4 jwurunner

jwurunner

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Location:MA,USA

Posted 05 January 2005 - 08:28 AM

Hi,
We have been using M.O.M. since 2000 and overall have been quite satisfied with the system.

1. For the price I believe M.O.M. is the best system for most small (under $20 million) mail order companies. Back in 1999 we tested a half dozen program that were 3 times the cost with less features.

2. Dydacomp's support is decent but not great. They have been able to solve most of our issues within 1 or 2 calls. Some smaller issues have gone unresolved(i.e. we are the only one having this problem) We do not use sitelink.

3. We looked at MAS 90, Ecometry and a few others that I can't remember (5yrs ago)

4. We have a custom design Cold Fusion driven website that we have on a dedicated hosting plan. Our system exports order to to M.O.M. without issues.

5. This is Dydacomp's biggest weak point. We use Fedex exclusively thus have no good shipping system. We are running clippership with some custom work that allows for the address to be pulled from M.O.M. We scan the tracking numbers back in as the labels print. If they integrated Fedex like they do UPS we would be happier.


If we were looking for software now with the same budget as before, chances are we would still go with M.O.M.

#5 jim bennett

jim bennett

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 05 January 2005 - 10:52 AM

We have been using MOM since 1998. Generally, MOM has been a good investment for my business. I do like the packer�s workstation and bar coding of items being packed. This feature has saved us money, improved productivity and reduced errors considerably.

MOM support
Generally good. There are some support personnel that will research my problems and follow up. I learned their names, kept notes, and always email the specific person about my issue, asking them to contact me. There are other tech support individuals, who when they pickup my call, I know it would be better to just hang up, dial again and wait on hold, sometimes for quite awhile, hoping one of the really good techs takes my call the second time.

Sitelink
There are better and less expensive alternatives

UPS Compatible Interface
Works flawless. No complaints at all.

FedEx Shipping
Awful, non-existent, a joke. I even purchased HarveySoft and MOM's USI in order to ship via FedEx. It was a waste of money and time. Printing an invoice at the packing stage using MOM and Harvey is impossible, plus numerous other problems.

Drop Shipping
MOM handles drop shipping generally well. Drop shipping is the only way, other than competitive shipping companies (FedEx and DHL) to control our shipping costs. MOM should invest considerable resources to enhancing drop shipping. For example: we need the option to make "Drop Ship" items to be a "Composite" item. We could then drop ship a full case of product in a variety of colors, instead of jut a single color. This feature would dramatically increase sales and make money for my company

Problems on the horizon
DHL shipping is not even being discussed. As a Mail order company, we are at the mercy of UPS. We pay what ever they demand. Excessive fees for address corrections, OS boxes, and on and on. The only way we have to control our shipping costs is to have alternative shipping companies (FedEx and DHL) in order to get UPS to the bargaining table.

Good Luck

#6 WHI

WHI

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts

Posted 05 January 2005 - 04:41 PM

We have a love/hate relationship with our MOM :D Most of this is learning curve and our curve is on its six year. I don't think you can find better for the money. Support when we need it is pretty good for database problems but I think you will do better just by asking questions on this board for day to day use questions. We are not using sitelink. Works great with world ship. Defiantly use authorise.net this was by far the best change the last few years. We are running version 4.3

#7 Guest_Yikes_*

Guest_Yikes_*
  • Guests

Posted 07 January 2005 - 03:02 PM

Our company been using MOM (I unwillingly since the first day) for a few years. As far as I can tell, the first person to set it up must have thought that spam email was the only way to find out about software, because I can only imagine that's how someone could be fooled into using MOM.

From the very first time I saw the program, I thought "My God, I hope we don't actually use that!". Unfortunately, we do, and I have been struggling to keep up with the data corruption and inconsistencies. Sitelink was bad, so we moved our website away from that (stupid people had a hand in that too, so it didn't help much) but MOM has been the one of the worst nighmares we have dealt with in our 7 years of business.

I would recommend you do NOT ever get yourself stuck in the rut that this program will certainly get you in. Your best bet would be to find someone who understands the Linux and open-source community, and who will find software which will suit your particular needs.

We cancelled our service contract because they refused to help us once when we had a problem, and they still try to send us bills. That makes me laugh. Some/one of the SiteLINK servers got hacked once (that I know of) and five of their sites, including ours, were defaced for about a day with something about the U.S. being terrorists, so that was fun.

I honestly don't know if the service has improved, but Foxpro (the underlying code upon which the MOM application is based) has a very poor API, so you are going to learn that it does not operate the way you are used to Windows working most of the time, and the rest of the time, does not work at all. If you are going to try to do any Windows API automation using tools such as UNISYN's Automate software, forget it. The Foxpro API does not have any recognizable handles which can be effectively used this way.

MOM has repeatedly proven unreliable and inconsistent for just about everything it is trusted to do, so if you're looking for a hellish nightmare which will certainly make you wish you had never tried to use it to run a business, then I say "Go for it". Otherwise, you'd better look elsewhere.

If I were you, I would also stay away from anything built around Windows web servers too, such as the DotNET architecture.

Microsoft software is only trouble, as eBay has finally decided to admit: http://www.ecommerce...ory/39325.html) and it is what MOM and SiteLINK are built on.

If you're serious about saving money and getting some serious, reliable software/hardware handling your data, then search the Gentoo forums for someone who knows Linux, Open Source, and e-commerce. Someone there should be able to help you find what you need.

#8 rrinker

rrinker

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Location:Reading, PA

Posted 11 January 2005 - 09:53 AM

Our company been using MOM (I unwillingly since the first day) for a few years.  As far as I can tell, the first person to set it up must have thought that spam email was the only way to find out about software, because I can only imagine that's how someone could be fooled into using MOM. 

From the very first time I saw the program, I thought "My God, I hope we don't actually use that!".  Unfortunately, we do, and I have been struggling to keep up with the data corruption and inconsistencies.  Sitelink was bad, so we moved our website away from that (stupid people had a hand in that too, so it didn't help much) but MOM has been the one of the worst nighmares we have dealt with in our 7 years of business. 

I would recommend you do NOT ever get yourself stuck in the rut that this program will certainly get you in. Your best bet would be to find someone who understands the Linux and open-source community, and who will find software which will suit your particular needs.

We cancelled our service contract because they refused to help us once when we had a problem, and they still try to send us bills.  That makes me laugh.  Some/one of the SiteLINK servers got hacked once (that I know of) and five of their sites, including ours, were defaced for about a day with something about the U.S. being terrorists, so that was fun.

I honestly don't know if the service has improved, but Foxpro (the underlying code upon which the MOM application is based) has a very poor API, so you are going to learn that it does not operate the way you are used to Windows working most of the time, and the rest of the time, does not work at all.  If you are going to try to do any Windows API automation using tools such as UNISYN's Automate software, forget it.  The Foxpro API does not have any recognizable handles which can be effectively used this way.

MOM has repeatedly proven unreliable and inconsistent for just about everything it is trusted to do, so if you're looking for a hellish nightmare which will certainly make you wish you had never tried to use it to run a business, then I say "Go for it".  Otherwise, you'd better look elsewhere.

If I were you, I would also stay away from anything built around Windows web servers too, such as the DotNET architecture.

Microsoft software is only trouble, as eBay has finally decided to admit: http://www.ecommerce...ory/39325.html) and it is what MOM and SiteLINK are built on.

If you're serious about saving money and getting some serious, reliable software/hardware handling your data, then search the Gentoo forums for someone who knows Linux, Open Source, and e-commerce.  Someone there should be able to help you find what you need.

View Post


Please. Visual Foxpro is probably the last truly good development package Microsoft has. No matter WHAT the application is written in, if the underlying database design is bad, the application will be bad.

#9 Videoflicks2004

Videoflicks2004

    GLOBAL MODERATOR

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:~ DVD ~ BLUE RAY ~ HD DVD ~ HOLOGRAPHIC DVD ~ Quantum Computing.

Posted 15 January 2005 - 10:00 AM

Hey,

Sorry it took soo long to give you my two cents...

1. Do you feel that MOM is a good value?

MOM software is excellent value in my opinion for the dollar. I've been using mom for over 5 years and I have researched the alternatives. For a small to medium sized business, MOM is the way to go. The program is modular, which lets you add on pieces you need as your business and investment capital grow.

We have not used SITELINK in over 2 years so I will not comment on the current version. We were not impressed with SITELINK back then and dropped it quick in exchange for custom "in house" development.

2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support? How about their SiteLink support?

We dropped Dydacomp's support 8 months ago. The long waits on the phone (on my dime) were horrible. Their support team were often rude and talked down to you. They would refer any useful work to MOM HELPERS. MOM Helpers wanted an arm and a leg to make the simplist of requests happen. To renew support would cost us $3000.00 USD. The only problem we have had in the last 8 months has been a start up issue that was quickly resolved by copying a start.sav file from a backup.



3. What other software packages did you consider before going with MOM?

MOM was already in use for a year when I joined my company.

4. Are you using SiteLink or an Alternative E-commerce suite? Do you host it yourself?

We use in house software written in SQL to host our websites. www.videoflicks.com www.videoflicks.ca www.cvsinc.ca www.videowholesale.ca

5. Do you integrate MOM with UPS WorldShip? Successfully?

UPS in CANADA does not yet integrate entirely with MOM.


Regards,

David
David Narciso
Ecommerce Operations Manager CVS Inc

[email protected]

mobile: 4168238175

DISCLAIMER: Always backup your MOMWIN folder before attempting to perform any updates, testing, etc. Once you blast the data away it's gone forever.
My advice is based on my 8 years of experience with MOM and Dydacomp. If you are not comfortable with data manipulation then hire someone who is.

#10 Guest_tbudzich_*

Guest_tbudzich_*
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2005 - 08:35 AM

Our company been using MOM (I unwillingly since the first day) for a few years.  As far as I can tell, the first person to set it up must have thought that spam email was the only way to find out about software, because I can only imagine that's how someone could be fooled into using MOM. 

From the very first time I saw the program, I thought "My God, I hope we don't actually use that!".  Unfortunately, we do, and I have been struggling to keep up with the data corruption and inconsistencies.  Sitelink was bad, so we moved our website away from that (stupid people had a hand in that too, so it didn't help much) but MOM has been the one of the worst nighmares we have dealt with in our 7 years of business. 

I would recommend you do NOT ever get yourself stuck in the rut that this program will certainly get you in. Your best bet would be to find someone who understands the Linux and open-source community, and who will find software which will suit your particular needs.

We cancelled our service contract because they refused to help us once when we had a problem, and they still try to send us bills.  That makes me laugh.  Some/one of the SiteLINK servers got hacked once (that I know of) and five of their sites, including ours, were defaced for about a day with something about the U.S. being terrorists, so that was fun.

I honestly don't know if the service has improved, but Foxpro (the underlying code upon which the MOM application is based) has a very poor API, so you are going to learn that it does not operate the way you are used to Windows working most of the time, and the rest of the time, does not work at all.  If you are going to try to do any Windows API automation using tools such as UNISYN's Automate software, forget it.  The Foxpro API does not have any recognizable handles which can be effectively used this way.

MOM has repeatedly proven unreliable and inconsistent for just about everything it is trusted to do, so if you're looking for a hellish nightmare which will certainly make you wish you had never tried to use it to run a business, then I say "Go for it".  Otherwise, you'd better look elsewhere.

If I were you, I would also stay away from anything built around Windows web servers too, such as the DotNET architecture.

Microsoft software is only trouble, as eBay has finally decided to admit: http://www.ecommerce...ory/39325.html) and it is what MOM and SiteLINK are built on.

If you're serious about saving money and getting some serious, reliable software/hardware handling your data, then search the Gentoo forums for someone who knows Linux, Open Source, and e-commerce.  Someone there should be able to help you find what you need.

View Post



I find this post entirely troubling... I can only speculate what this poster's background is, but I can say that anyone worth their salt doesn't go into a situation (especially Information Systems related) with such a closed mindset.

Does Microsoft develop great software and solutions? No.
Is their stuff reallythat bad? No.

I seriously doubt most folks from the open source community could actually provide an adequate solution. The fact is, they can't. There is simply too much custom work that would be required to build anything remotely like MOM, and the integration issues that would result could become so cumbersome that you would be in a worse situation that this guy describes.

Also, I'm not a raving fan of MOM and Dydacomp, but I'm smart enough to recognize that they have a large install base, and significant experience in the industry. They didn't come from nowhere, and they're not dissappearing anytime soon.

#11 Guest_Guest_NobleNull_*_*

Guest_Guest_NobleNull_*_*
  • Guests

Posted 02 March 2005 - 08:32 AM

I appreciate all of the responses that I have received. Our company still has not decided on what software package to purchase, and MOM is definately still in the running.

Datacom support... They are friendly, but useless.
This seems to be a running theme on this site, as well as all over the net. Our small IT staff is really good, but we definately expect a high level of support from the software vendor. Especially if it runs every aspect of our business. It is a risk we are not willing to take.

Sitelink. There are better and less expensive alternatives
This also seems to be the general concensus. Our website currently runs on OsCommerce, and I assume we would be able to import orders with some fairly easy customization.

MOM handles drop shipping generally well.
We do a lot of drop shipping and are glad to hear that people are generally happy with the way that MOM handles it.

Your best bet would be to find someone who understands the Linux and open-source community, and who will find software which will suit your particular needs.
Our company is fairly comfortable with using open source software. We have done a huge amount of research and have not been able to find anything close to what MOM or other commercial software has to offer. Compiere and OFBiz are the two packages that we looked at the closest, and neither one seems mature enough for us to invest time and money in. If there are other open source packages that are worth a look, please let me know.

We've looked at New Haven Software, MOM, Mailware, MAS 90 / 200, and just about every other platform in our price range. We are still extremely unsatisfied with most of the things that we have found. We are not happy with our current software, but do not feel that stepping into another bad software platform is the answer.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

#12 john

john

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 02 March 2005 - 12:49 PM

The company I work for is thinking about purchasing MOM.  I would like to get a few user opinions before we make our decision.  Please let me know what you think.

>>my company has used it for a year.  we are generally satisfied.  parts of the application are great, some are average, and parts are sub-par. but it is not too expensive, and you'll get a lot of productivity from the order entry part.

1. Do you feel that MOM is a good value?

all and all.  yes.

2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support?  How about their SiteLink support?

it is only okay.  when you get to finance and accounting issues, they will not be able to help.

my real complaint is that they don't have a certified third party consultant network.

3. What other software packages did you consider before going with MOM?

all the mid-range apps.  either way too expensive, did not fit well, or just wet-paint at this point.  i would look at four seasons software in the future.

4. Are you using SiteLink or an Alternative E-commerce suite?  Do you host it yourself?

ablecommerce app - so far so good.

5. Do you integrate MOM with UPS WorldShip?  Successfully?

yes.  wrote our own tool in RR to map to worldship - works great.

Thank you in advance for all who answer.

View Post



#13 George

George

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 09 May 2005 - 04:12 PM

You may have already made a decision, but here's my 2 cents:

I've been using MOM for 2.5 years, and it's great for out-of-the-box order fulfillment, and the price was nice at the time. Looking back, I wish we had ponied up for a SQL-based system. My #2 candidate was InOrder software by Morse Data: http://www.morsedata.com

1) I believe that MOM is a good value. However, you may have to alter your business policies to fit MOM, rather than altering MOM to fit your business. Certainly, you can pay the MOMHelpers to customize the program, but they are pricey, and pretty much the only game in town.

2) Dydacomp's support and SiteLink's support are OK, just like the other posts mention. I've often given their techies the answer after researching it myself. If you press them, they will get a programmer involved, but not if you're being a jerk about it. SiteLink's support tries to please, but remember that they are limited by the fuctions of their programs.

3) We considered:
* InOrder, which finished #2 (link is listed above)
* Everest, http://www.icode.com/ (too many Indian techies, couldn't understand them, and the system was just OK)
* Colinear, http://www.colinear.com - (I fixed this on 5/18, having mixed up the company names) These people were very friendly. but didn't have an ecommerce option. Recently, they've partnered up with commercev3.com, and now have an integrated package. I would have seriously considered using them, since we are considering using commercev3 for our online site, and importing orders into MOM.
* Oracle had a solution, but it was very pricey.
* avexxis.com, dmasales.com, imssoft.com, rev2.com, rigden.com, terno.com, and zirconsoftware.com were all ones that I reviewed, but rejected.

One guy has a web site devoted to catalog management software, but he charges $90 for the guide. I simply printed off the list of ones he reviewed and contacted them myself. He's gotten smarter, and removed the list. http://www.schell.com/guide/

4) We took SiteLink right up to implementation, and pulled the plug before launching, because it would have been a major step backwards. They have made a lot of improvements to their offerings since then, though.

5) We don't use the integration tool with WorldShip, due to a few problems. MOM exports the daily shipping info to a table that WorldShip uses to pull information from (name, address, etc). However, you have to enter all of the shipments into WorldShip and print all of the labels before sending any more packages from MOM. Why? Because the new info from MOM will overwrite the old info from your earlier process. We use a 3rd party software from HarveySoft, which manages the data by appending the old transfer, rather than overwriting it. HarveySoft cost us about $1700, plus implementation, and ongoing tech support.

I think you should discount the advice from the Microsoft-basher, since he/she doesn't provide you with a viable and cost-effective alternative. I'm in favor of open-source software, but there simply aren't good choices with robust support and teams of personnel working on potential problems.

#14 Guest_AJS73_*

Guest_AJS73_*
  • Guests

Posted 11 May 2005 - 06:15 PM

Whether MOM will work with your business depends greatly upon what you expect from it. For some time, MOM served us quite well and allowed us to grow as we implemented small points of automation here and there. All in all, for the money, it's a quite good program. Their customer service/ordertaking portion, for example is excellent. However, whether or not it will suit your needs really depends on how you will be using it. For example - how many warehouse do you have? How many do you plan on having? Do you want to use wireless scanners for inventory control? How do you want to pick/sort orders?

The only reason I would consider using World Ship would be if you ship internationally. Otherwise DO NOT DO IT. We were convinced by our UPS rep/consulting team that Worldship would speed us up, but it caused major issues and a major mess. We would up going back to the integrated UPS link solution, which really does work great - if you want to use UPS.

We're currently evaluating the next level of software up the line and will most likely be moving off MOM in the next few months. If you're interested, I'm happy to speak with you about my experiences with MOM over the last 2.5-3 years (including how we partially automated imports from our non-sitelink website).

We also may have a license for sale if that's something you would be interested in...

You can reach me at 805-637-9868.

Best of luck with the research,
Andrew

The company I work for is thinking about purchasing MOM.  I would like to get a few user opinions before we make our decision.  Please let me know what you think.

1. Do you feel that MOM is a good value?

2. Are you satisfied with Dynacomps support?  How about their SiteLink support?

3. What other software packages did you consider before going with MOM?

4. Are you using SiteLink or an Alternative E-commerce suite?  Do you host it yourself?

5. Do you integrate MOM with UPS WorldShip?  Successfully?

Thank you in advance for all who answer.

View Post






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users